Trade deal
Recent negotiations for the ambitious India-USA trade deal have ignited a fierce debate, largely due to a distinct lack of transparency. As of now, a finalised free trade agreement (FTA) remains elusive. An interim framework was announced on February 2 that centres on tariffs and market access, but actual ratification hangs in the balance, stalled by legal uncertainties in the US. When it comes to tariff adjustments, there is potential for significant changes. The US has tentatively agreed to slash tariffs on Indian goods down to about 18%. In contrast, India is considering lowering or even eliminating tariffs on many US products, though the specifics of these negotiations are still being ironed out. A key aspect of these discussions is energy policy, particularly in the light of India’s ongoing reduction of Russian oil imports to align with US foreign policy. This move has raised eyebrows and stirred tensions, especially among local farmers and unions in India, who fear that reduced tariffs might jeopardise their livelihoods and local industries. Moreover, the prospect of US agencies overseeing India’s oil purchases from Russia has been viewed as a source of humiliation for many. It is crucial to remember that this deal is not yet legally binding. There are still several markets that are not fully open, and sensitive sectors may retain protective measures. The anticipated figure of $500 billion in increased US purchases is more of a hopeful projection than a concrete obligation. Ultimately, the interim framework represents a step toward easing trade tensions, but it feels as though the government has rushed into announcing an agreement before finishing negotiations. This haste may be an attempt to gain a political edge ahead of the upcoming assembly elections. Given that the government commands a 42% vote share, it would be wise to bring this critical issue before the Parliament for discussion among representatives of the 58% of Indian voters who might be affected by such sweeping changes. Engaging in open dialogue could provide the clarity needed to navigate this complex landscape.
Pinakpani Bharadwaj, Dona Paula
Saving Goa
This is with reference to the news report ‘Chorus grows louder against Section 39 A of TCP Act’ (NT February 23). If people of Goa have come out in large numbers on the streets in protest against the Town and Country Planning Department (TCP), it is because we are witnessing destruction of our beautiful Goa in the name of development through the use of Section 39A of the TCP Act. It is time the Goa government and the TCP department realised that we have adequate protection under the state regional plans, which have been meticulously planned for sustainable development of Goa through zoning across cities, towns and rural areas. Hence, we do not require Section 39A of the TCP Act, which involves conversion of lakhs of square metres of eco-sensitive areas into settlement zones. Even a few ODPs (Outline Development plans) in North Goa have been cancelled by the High Court, as they are not in line with the regional plans. Goa is a small state and we are in no position to compete with other countries and turn the state into a concrete jungle.
A F Nazareth, Alto Porvorim
Provide searchable
PDF of electoral roll
The Election Commission of India (ECI) has carried out the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Goa and the final electoral roll has been published on February 21. The Office of the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), Goa, has hosted the electoral rolls on the website of the Chief Electoral Officer of Goa. I visited the website and tried to search the electoral rolls. But it is a cumbersome process because the PDF electoral rolls are not searchable. Hence, the rolls are virtually of no use because we, electors, cannot be expected to print copies and physically search through thousands of pages. Therefore, I request you to promptly provide searchable PDF electoral rolls of SIR.
Sadanand Raikar, Colva
World peace
Goodwill and harmony are two critical pillars for world peace. Additionally, poverty and hunger need to be tackled expeditiously to promote global peace and understanding. Furthermore, boosting cultural exchange and human rights for global tranquillity cannot be stressed enough. When world leaders prioritise dialogue over conflict, peace may yet be within reach. At the same time, if promotion of peace and absence of conflict cannot go together, the ability to handle conflict peacefully is an alternative because an eye for an eye can make the whole world blind. Although the ‘World Day of Peace and Understanding’ on February 23 was not an official UN day, the day carried great significance because it coincided with the inception of the Rotary International in 1905. According to peace proponents, understanding, empathy and collaboration are the three crucial pedestals on which peace stands.
Ganapathi Bhat, Akola
