AP
Brussels
European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, on Monday, rejected calls for a Europe-wide army, warning that it could be âextremely dangerousâ as the bloc considers ways to provide its own security after the United States warned that its priorities lie elsewhere.
Talk of a European army has resurfaced amid tensions within NATO over President Donald Trumpâs threats to annex Greenland, the semi-autonomous territory of
NATO-ally Denmark.
âThose who say that we need a European army, maybe those people havenât really thought this through practically,â Kallas said. âIf you are already part of NATO then you canât create a separate army.â
Kallas told a security conference in Norway that the most important military asset during a crisis âis the chain of command – who gives orders to whom.â
She added: âAnd if you have, like the European army and then you have the NATO (one), then, you know, the ball just falls between the chairs. And this is extremely,
extremely dangerous.â
NATOâs military operations are overseen by a Supreme Allied Commander, who is always a top US officer. The role is currently held by Airforce Lieutenant Genera Alexus Grynkewich.
Norwayâs Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store said: âNATO is there with the decision-making process among allies, which is in itself complex, but it is trained to work.â He rejected calls for a European army, saying that âit is not a road we should travel.â Norway is not a member
of the EU.
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said last week that Europe is incapable of defending itself without US military support and would have to more than double current military spending targets to be able to do so.
âIf anyone thinks here that the European Union or Europe as a whole can defend itself without the US, keep on dreaming. You canât,â Rutte told EU lawmakers in Brussels.
Europe and the United States âneed each other,â he said.